Evolutionary period of developing countries

France is in the final phase of the evolutionary period of development whose sources belong to the time of the “Great Depression”. In this case, the student disturbances in 1968 became distinctive “political frosts” which stimulated left-centrist political directives. In the geopolitical sense, they arose, we may say, in the controversy to tendencies of the Renaissance of rightcentrist political moods in the countries of social commonwealth in the period of the so-called “political thaw” happened in the USSR after the death of I. Stalin.The socio-historical subject “I” remains to be leading now for France.

 Germany is, after the national unification (1989), in the final phase of the evolutionary period of development like France. The process of accumulation of innovations stimulates gradually, but inevitably the appearance of preconditions for the start of a new cycle of development of the German social organism as a supernational community within the framework of the European Union. Of course, the socio-historical subject “I” continues also to play the leading role there.

Great Britain is also solving problems of the evolutionary stage of the epochal cycle from the governing of “new labourites”. The active phase of this stage can be referred to 1979–1990, the period of the governing of M. Thatcher, which is evidenced by the transmission of authorities from the center to the periphery (the renewal of local assemblies in Scotland, Welsh, and North Ireland).
The subject “I” remains to be a key historical factor.  Italy experiences the evolutionary stage of development with sharpening the contradictions between the rich northern regions where the socio-historical heritage of the Latin West prevails and poor southern ones with domination of the
cultural-historical Roman-Byzantine influence.

United States of America will come, possibly in the nearest time, into the revolutionary stage of a new epochal cycle as a universal superstate. The first symptoms of socio-historical changes appeared already during the presidential elections in November 2000. The subject “I” manifested itself in the full scope.
For example, the 43th President of the USA G. Bush even refused the electronic correspondence with friends, because his e-mail letters could stand by a matter of public discussion. At the beginning of the XXIst century, USA will take examination as for the ability to adapt to the complicated and contradictory life of the post-industrial society.

By the examples of the USA and countries of West Europe, we can trace the tendency to the gradual vanishing of traditional political parties of the industrial epoch and the objective formation of “parties of a new type” as a result of the new post-industrial values of the Internet epoch. That is, the subject “I” becomes active on the party level as well.
Thus, in the leading countries of Western Europe and the USA, we see the existence of a synchronization of the phases of development (of course, with a certain national specificity) and the type of a leading socio-historical subject “I” which is intrinsic not only to the evolutionary period of the epochal cycle experienced by the majority of the above-mentioned countries, but it is primary
importance for the next revolutionary period which will open a new cycle of social development.
For this reason, we have all grounds to consider that the pattern for the leading eastern-Slavic countries, Ukraine and Russia, will be similar.